| There are some aspects of such a claim we need | | | | were the original promoters and as the old saying |
| to consider, the first of course is the timing. How | | | | goes "self praise is no recommendation". |
| can it be voted the "best opportunity of 2008" | | | | Finally what were the criteria for deciding "the |
| when there are still 9 months of the year to | | | | best"? There may be many different opinions on |
| elapse. Do these people have knowledge of all the | | | | what is "best". Some want to get into profit |
| programmes that are to be introduced in 2008? | | | | quickly, others would be happy to wait a littler |
| Imagine the reaction from Hollywood if the "best | | | | longer and earn a greater amount. Indeed some |
| picture of 2008" was declared in March 2008!! | | | | are looking for a quick profit and a jump into a |
| As with all of these sorts of claims I apply some | | | | new program while still others would be happy |
| business basics and aks the question. Has anyone | | | | with a good but consistent income. Of course |
| checked every single program that was on offer | | | | there are those that will only be satisfied with a |
| at the time? I am sure they have not! | | | | monthly income of six figures. "The best" without |
| Note the claim does not clearly define what a | | | | qualifying criteria becomes a subjective choice so |
| "new opportunity" is. Are all opportunities that are | | | | is no guide for us at all. |
| in existence prior to January 1 excluded from the | | | | What these promoters fail to consider is their |
| vote? Many of them will be new in 2008 if they | | | | overall credibility. If you can analyse some their |
| were introduced very late in 2007. How old does | | | | claims and show them to be flawed how can you |
| a program have to be before it is no longer a | | | | have faith in the rest of them. I presume they |
| "new opportunity"? They are all new to anyone | | | | hope we will not take a critical and analytical look |
| who has not seen them before no matter when | | | | at the claims but just accept them as true. |
| they were introduced. | | | | Of course such action is contrary to all the |
| The next question is who voted? I could not find | | | | business basics both on and off the Internet and |
| any reference to any panel or authority that had | | | | should not be followed by anyone who hopes to |
| taken this vote. I rather suspect the only voters | | | | succeed in any business. |