ROI: False Conclusions

Drawing false conclusions from Return onwhat they had predicted.
Investment analysis can be embarrassing and itThey dropped their prices considerably below
can be costly.what Company A was charging.
Here's an example from business in managing riskTheir market share increased to 45% during the
and calculating Return on Investment ROI:first six months of the new operation and then
The management of company A wanted togradually increased to 65% during the next two
decrease the cost of manufacturing a keyyears.
product. This was in light of new technologies thatDuring this period, Company A realized they
had just become available.should have included something in their analysis
They have 60% of the available business with thisconcerning the probability of their competitors
product and their closest competitor, Company B,taking market share. They started the
has 14% of the market.modernization of their factory.
Company C has about 10%.The owners of the company were very
The other 16% is held by several small companiesdissatisfied with the performance of the company.
that sell a substitute product of lower cost butAfter sacking the Board and certain members of
inferior performance.management, they sold the company to
Company A calculated the cost of reducingCompany B.
manufacturing cost. They then calculated theTo the Chairman of the Board who had said, "All
return on investment (ROI). The return was lessis well!" the owners said, "Farewell!"
than the 15% required by company management.Company B accelerated the modernization of the
A Board member with an accounting degree andfacilities of Company A to increase their
banking experience said the technology lookedproduction while lowering costs.
"shaky" to him.This was done in the face of the fact that
Some board members agreed with him.Company C had lost market share to Company B
The company's engineering director said thebut had responded rapidly and had just completed
assumption was wrong, that the technology wouldtheir modernization which would help them regain
function as described.what they had lost and perhaps do more damage
The Board rejected the modernization plan.to Company B.
Company A continued to undersell company BThe war price war was on.
because of their current lower manufacturingThe above example is similar to that given at a
cost.management conference on managing technology
The Chairman of the Board said, "All is well!"I attended some years ago in Miami, Florida. The
Company B did the very same analysis at theexecutive who gave the presentation was from
same time. Company B decided to make thethe General Electric Company. Unfortunately, I
investment because it would lower theirdon't remember his name.
manufacturing cost, increase production capacity,The bottom line is that if your analysis is not
and they would be able to undercut Company A'scomprehensive, and you don't consider the
current prices by 5%.possible actions of your competitors, you can fail
Company B used the probable increase of theirmiserably.
market share in their ROI calculations.You must also consider who has the best
When Company B completed the improvementsbackground and education to make technical
in manufacturing, which took two (2) yearsdecisions and who has the best background and
including planning, they learned that theeducation to make financial decisions. Opinions are
manufacturing cost dropped another 5% belownot always evaluations.