Selective Catalytic Reduction How NOx Reduction Make the World Go Green

ign="center">used in the engine and then broken down into
With the turn of the century, there has been anammonia. The products of this reaction, after it
increase in concern over the health of the planet.has gone through a catalyst are those elemental
Scientist and the government work hard to trynitrogen and water.
and make changes to the environment. ThereThe SCR Catalyst has been shown to do a
was a realization that without the world, theresignificant amount of work on the NOx reduction.
was no life and therefore, it was imperative toHowever, there are other routes, as well, that
save the world. With nations continuing tocan be used to try and reduce the NOx
industrialize, it has become increasingly difficult toconcentrations in the environment. One of these
curb the greenhouse gases and dangerous toxinsis the use of engine management which, as the
that are destructive to the world.name suggests, is the control of the amount of
One of those toxins is called NOx. NO is nitricemissions in an engine. There are fewer emissions
oxide and NO2 is nitrogen dioxide. Both of thesereleased, but then the engine runs less effectively
are components of NOx in differentwhich results in the build-up of soot.
concentrations. Typically, people have no idea thatOne final method is a NOx trap which catches the
there is NOx around because not only is itNOx and then catalytically converts that stored
colorless, it also has no odor. Because of this, itNOx, through acts of reduction, into basic N2 and
can unwittingly be released into the environment.CO2. Nitrogen in its elemental form is not
There are a plethora of places that have nitrogendamaging to the environment. While CO2 can be
oxide emissions. Almost half of all these emissionsdamaging to the environment, it is not nearly as
come directly from automobiles. At the turn ofdamaging as the NOx gases that are released by
the century, a lot of people were driving around inthe automobiles. CO2 is the lesser of two evils.
large, gas guzzling SUVs that did nothing moreWhat these three techniques have in common is
than produce an increase in these emissions.that they all are trying to reduce the NOx levels.
Ironically, the economic downturn has shaped theHowever, SCR catalyst is the one that has been
society into a more green-friendly nation.shown to have the most effect on the reduction
However, anything that uses some sort of aof NOx concentration levels. There is no concern
hydrocarbon for its gas will produce some formof a lower effectiveness of the automobile and
of NOx. Typically, most are found to be NO.there is no need for a "lesser of two evils"
Often times, people question why this matters.approach because most of the NOx is converted
They don't appreciate the environmental concernsinto water and elemental nitrogen. The only
connected to NOx. The most important concerndownfall is that there needs to be some way of
is the effect NOx has on the human respiratorygetting the urea into the system. If that occurs,
system. NO combines with ammonia which leadsthis is definitely an effective tool.
to the formation of nitric acid which is anEach technique has its ups and downs. Some
incredibly strong acid that can do a seriouswork better than others (SCR), but even that
amount of damage to the body. Small particleshas its negatives. It is important to determine
get into the lungs and puncture holes in themwhat the cost to productiveness ratio is that
which can lead to a potentially fatal result.automobile companies are willing to spend. What is
There are things that are being done to try andtoo much? What is clear, though, is that the
prevent this NOx from becoming too much of anenvironment is not getting any stronger and if
issue. In some areas, one of the big tools beingpeople are truly concerned about it, they need to
used is selective catalytic reduction. What thistake the necessary steps to prevent against
does in non-technical terms is create elementalfurther degradation, if that means spending a little
nitrogen and water. Neither of these is harmful onmore money, that might be the necessary course
the environment. In more technical terms, urea isof action.